All posts

5 min readComparisonRemote access

Claude Code Remote Control vs an agent room

Remote Control lets you continue your own Claude Code session from your phone. An agent room lets other people send work to that agent while you approve what runs. They solve different problems, and you may want both.

By Noah· Product at Muti AI

Claude Code Remote Control is Anthropic’s way to continue a Claude Code session that is running on your machine from a phone or a browser. An agent room is a shared space where a few people you trust can send work to the coding agent on your machine while you approve what runs. Remote Control is about you on another device. A room is about other people.

If you only ever want to reach your own agent from the couch, Remote Control is the right tool and it is built in. If a co-founder, a teammate or a partner needs to ask your agent for something, you need a room. This post lays out the difference precisely so you can pick, or combine them.

What Remote Control does

Remote Control, released as a research preview in February 2026, turns any browser or the Claude mobile app into a window onto a Claude Code session running locally. You start it with claude remote-control or /remote-control inside a session. The session registers with the Anthropic API, polls for work and streams messages back. Your code, environment variables, MCP connections and project configuration stay on your machine, and the connection is outbound HTTPS only, so nothing opens a port.

The limits are the ones you would expect from a personal remote: it is single-user, so you cannot invite a colleague into the session; each Claude Code instance supports one remote session at a time outside server mode, and only one device can be connected at once; the terminal has to stay open and the machine awake. Availability started with Max subscribers and has been widening since, so check the current docs for your plan.

What an agent room does

An agent room gives the agent an address that other people can reach. The agent is still Claude Code or Codex on your machine, with your subscription and your files. A small daemon polls muti for work over an outbound connection, runs the request locally, and streams every tool call back into the room. The people you invite sign in with a browser and install nothing.

Three things follow. Several people can talk to the same agent, each with their own permission mode. Requests queue in the agent’s inbox while the machine is asleep and run when it is back, because the daemon can be installed as a service. And the four dangerous action types, pushing to a shared branch, deleting, spending money and touching credentials, pause for you no matter who asked. See what is an agent room for the full definition.

Remote Control connects one person to one session. A room connects several people to one agent, with the owner approving.Remote Control connects one person to one session. A room connects several people to one agent, with the owner approving.

Side by side

Claude Code Remote ControlAn agent room (muti)
Who can talk to the agentYouAnyone you invite, per room
DevicesOne connected device per sessionAny number; it’s a web page
What the other side seesYour full session, as youThe room’s timeline: tool calls, diffs, outputs
PermissionsYour own Claude Code permission modePer person: read-only, edit, full trust; four actions always pause
While the machine sleepsSession unavailableRequests wait in the inbox and run on return
RuntimesClaude CodeClaude Code and Codex today, more detected
Install for othersNot applicableNothing; a browser and an invite link
CostIncluded with eligible Claude plansFree during private beta; you keep your existing subscription
Best forContinuing your own work across devicesLetting others use your agent on your terms

When Remote Control is the better choice

  • You are the only person who will ever talk to the agent.
  • You want zero extra software and you already have an eligible plan.
  • You want to see the session exactly as it looks in your terminal, including the parts a shared timeline would summarise.
  • You are happy to keep the terminal open while you are away.

When a room is the better choice

  • Someone other than you needs to ask the agent for work: a co-founder rerunning tests, a designer exporting assets, a partner converting a folder of videos.
  • You want to say yes or no per request, or mark one person as trusted while another stays read-only.
  • You want the risky calls to stop for you even when you are not watching.
  • The machine may be asleep when the request arrives and you would rather it queue than fail.
  • You want a history you can hand to someone: who asked, what ran, what came back.

Using both

They compose. Remote Control is a good way to drive your own session from a phone while you are the one working. A room is the way to receive work from others. The same machine can run a Remote Control session in one terminal and the muti daemon as a background service, because both use outbound connections and neither needs an open port.

Frequently asked questions

Does muti replace Claude Code Remote Control? No. Remote Control is for you on another device; a room is for other people. Many owners use Remote Control to work and a room to share.

Can I use a room without giving anyone else access? Yes. A room with only you in it is a personal inbox for your agent, and the phone workflow works the same way.

Does either one move my code to the cloud? No. Both keep the agent, the repositories and the credentials on your machine. Remote Control relays your session through the Anthropic API; muti relays timeline events through its room service. Neither uploads your working tree.

Which runtimes work? Remote Control is a Claude Code feature. A muti room works with Claude Code and Codex today, and the daemon detects other runtimes installed on the machine.

If the question you are actually asking is “how do I let someone else use my agent”, give it a room.

Published · Updated

Give your agent a room.

muti is free during the private beta. Connect the machine where your agents live and invite the people you trust.

Get started

Keep reading

6 min readComparison

QoderWake and muti

Of every agent product launched in 2026, Alibaba's QoderWake is the closest in shape to muti. Both run on your own machine, and both let a group send it work, through a chat that has to be paired first. They split on whose agent it is, what it runs, and who approves when a colleague's request reaches a delete.

9 min readComparison

WorkBuddy, QwenWork and QoderWake

Tencent's WorkBuddy lets you drive the agent on your own computer from WeChat and WeCom. Alibaba's QwenWork merges desktop, cloud and DingTalk agents into one product. QoderWake runs a team of digital employees on your machine behind a single bot the whole group can mention. All three let colleagues use the agent. They answer how in very different ways.

5 min readPersonal agents

An agent with its own phone number

Manus Cue gives each personal agent an email address, a phone number, a wallet and a computer. That makes the agent reachable by anyone who has the number, which changes the permission question from "what may my agent do" to "what may a stranger make it do". What Manus 2.0 shipped, and what reachability asks of an agent.